| How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis HB Seeberg Political Studies 65 (2), 475-492, 2017 | 137 | 2017 |
| The opposition's policy influence through issue politicisation HB Seeberg Journal of Public Policy 33 (1), 89-107, 2013 | 80 | 2013 |
| The bureaucracy and the policy agenda M Baekgaard, PB Mortensen, H Bech Seeberg Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2), 239-253, 2018 | 50 | 2018 |
| Do voters learn? Evidence that voters respond accurately to changes in political parties’ policy positions HB Seeberg, R Slothuus, R Stubager West European Politics 40 (2), 336-356, 2017 | 46 | 2017 |
| The power of talk and the welfare state: Evidence from 23 countries on an asymmetric opposition-government response mechanism C Jensen, HB Seeberg Socio-Economic Review 13 (2), 215-233, 2015 | 44 | 2015 |
| The impact of opposition criticism on the public’s evaluation of government competence HB Seeberg Party Politics 26 (4), 484-495, 2020 | 25 | 2020 |
| Opposition Policy Influence through Agenda‐setting: The Environment in D enmark, 1993–2009 HB Seeberg Scandinavian Political Studies 39 (2), 185-206, 2016 | 24 | 2016 |
| Cooperation between counterparts in parliament from an agenda-setting perspective: legislative coalitions as a trade of criticism and policy FJ Christiansen, HB Seeberg West European Politics 39 (6), 1160-1180, 2016 | 21 | 2016 |
| One size doesn't fit all: Voter decision criteria heterogeneity and vote choice R Stubager, HB Seeberg, F So Electoral Studies 52, 1-10, 2018 | 20 | 2018 |
| First avoidance, then engagement: Political parties’ issue competition in the electoral cycle HB Seeberg Party Politics 28 (2), 284-293, 2022 | 19 | 2022 |
| Why are some policy agendas larger than others? PB Mortensen, HB Seeberg Policy Studies Journal 44 (2), 156-175, 2016 | 18 | 2016 |
| A series of persuasive events. Sequencing effects of negative and positive messages on party evaluations and perceptions of negativity A Nai, HB Seeberg Journal of Marketing Communications 24 (4), 412-432, 2018 | 16 | 2018 |
| What can a party say? How parties' communication can influence voters' issue ownership perceptions R Stubager, HB Seeberg Electoral Studies 44, 162-171, 2016 | 16 | 2016 |
| What can a government do? Government issue ownership and real‐world problems HB Seeberg European Journal of Political Research 56 (2), 346-363, 2017 | 13 | 2017 |
| How political parties’ issue ownerships reduce to spatial proximity HB Seeberg West European Politics 43 (6), 1238-1261, 2020 | 11 | 2020 |
| Issue ownership attack: how a political party can counteract a rival’s issue ownership HB Seeberg West European Politics 43 (4), 772-794, 2020 | 11 | 2020 |
| Explaining Local Policy Agendas B Mortensen, MW Loftis, HB Seeberg Springer International Publishing, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
| Undermining a rival party’s issue competence through negative campaigning: Experimental evidence from the USA, Denmark, and Australia HB Seeberg, A Nai Political Studies 69 (3), 623-643, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
| On the enemy’s turf: Exploring the link between macro-and micro-framing in interest group communication C Jensen, HB Seeberg Journal of European Public Policy 27 (7), 1054-1073, 2020 | 8 | 2020 |
| Negatively affecting voters’ issue considerations. An experimental study of parties’ attack communication J Lefevere, HB Seeberg, S Walgrave Political Communication 37 (6), 812-831, 2020 | 6 | 2020 |
Peter B. MortensenProfessor, Political Science, Aarhus UniversityVerified email at ps.au.dk
